It’s that time of year folks and Exodus 18:21 remains valid because it is not fundamentally about Israel’s government as some suggest; it is about God’s design for trustworthy leadership. Governments change. Constitutions change. Political parties change. But the need for leaders who fear God, love truth, possess competence, and reject greed never changes. The qualifications endure because they are rooted in the unchanging character of God and the unchanging realities of human nature.
One can easily make the case that modern nations are not necessarily obligated to adopt the entire civil, ceremonial, and religious codes of ancient Israel. (Although, this would be an important discussion as well.) The principle of E18 endures even though the covenantal context has changed. I would suggest the following reasons to uphold this standard for Christians going to ballot boxes to vote.
- The Source of the Counsel is Pre-Mosaic
An often-overlooked fact is that the advice came from Moses’ father-in-law, Jethro, before the giving of much of the Mosaic legislation. Jethro’s counsel was not based on ceremonial law, temple worship, sacrifices, or Israel’s unique national covenant. It reflected practical wisdom concerning how human beings should govern and administer justice. This suggests the qualifications are rooted in universal principles rather than temporary regulations. It is also a part of the closed canon of Scripture which carries the force of full inspiration.
- The Qualifications are Moral, not Ceremonial
The qualifications are, ability, fear of God, committed to objective truth, and rejection of greed. Nothing in that list belongs to Israel’s ceremonial system. The New Testament teaches that ceremonial aspects of the Mosaic covenant have been fulfilled in Christ, but moral virtues such as truthfulness, integrity, and justice remain binding on all believers. No orthodox Christian can successfully argue that honesty or freedom from greed expired at Calvary.
- The New Testament affirms Similar Standards
When the New Testament discusses church leadership, it emphasizes the same kind of character qualities.
For example, 1 Timothy and Titus require leaders to be above reproach, self-controlled, faithful, and not lovers of money.
The continuity is striking between the Old and New Testaments.
OT states we are to fear God.
NT states we are to be reverent and godly.
OT states we are to be men of truth.
NT states were are above reproach.
OT states we are to hate covetousness.
NT states we are not lovers of money.
OT states we are to be “able”.
NT states we are to be “able”.
If these qualities are required for spiritual leadership under the New Covenant, there is every reason to view them as beneficial for civil leadership as well. Because human nature remains fallen, the qualifications needed to restrain those tendencies remain relevant. A leader who fears God, loves truth, and rejects bribery is no less valuable in the twenty-first century than in the fifteenth century B.C.
- Scripture Repeatedly applies the same Principle Elsewhere
Exodus 18:21 is not an isolated text. Throughout Scripture, rulers are evaluated by moral character:
- Proverbs 16:12 — righteousness establishes a throne.
- Proverbs 29:2 — righteous rulers bring rejoicing.
- 2 Samuel 23:3 — rulers should govern in the fear of God.
- Romans 13:1–4 — civil authorities are God’s servants for justice.
The Bible consistently teaches that the moral quality of leaders matters.
- Jesus Fulfilled the Ideal rather than Abolish It.
Christ did not overturn the virtues of Exodus 18:21; He perfectly embodied them. Jesus was:
- Able
- Truthful
- God-fearing
- Free from greed
- Just in judgment
The coming of Christ does not lessen the importance of these virtues. It magnifies them by showing their perfect expression in the ideal King and Ruler. We should endorse and validate no less.
No Comments